The Power of Many Blogs nudge Kerry team toward rigorous Ohio recount

How do I order the book?
Order it directly from Amazon:

Amazon.com

Or look for it in your favorite neighborhood (independent or chain) bookstore. Ask them to order it for you if you don't see it on the shelves or right up front.

Search

Upcoming
Technorizzle

Blogs nudge Kerry team toward rigorous Ohio recount

As I just posted over at Personal Democracy Forum (Trippi says blogs driving Kerry camp's interest in recount):

On MSNBC's Countdown, Keith Olbermann has been one of the few television newshosts tracking down the issues related to counting and recounting votes and addressing potential voting irregularities (such as voter fraud and suppression), particularly in the closest states.

Without appearing in any way to contest the election, the Kerry campaign lawyers do seem to be pressing for a careful validation of the results in Ohio. A rush transcript I just received via email quotes Joe Trippi giving credit to the rumor mills of the blogosphere for keeping the recount / potential voting irregularities stories alive long enough to encourage the Kerry people to "get back into the game":

TRIPPI: I don‘t think there‘s any question about it. I mean, I think they were willing to walk away from it on election night. I think they wouldn‘t be sending anybody on this mission unless, except for the fact that the blogosphere went out, grabbed the story. And you know, it was something we were seeing all day at MSNBC. Citizen journalists were commenting on our blog of problems that they were seeing in Ohio. We have the make your Count Vote Project that MSNBC was running, has 2000 recorded complaints from Ohio. So these complaints were out there. But it was blogosphere that picked them up, ran with then, and then bloggerman yourself reported it. And I think it sort of got - another one of those stories that jumped in the mainstream media. And now all these campaigns are reacting to it, and I think even using it as a valid excuse to go in and see what‘s there and try to, you know, at least count every vote. Make sure some of this stuff didn‘t happen.

 

Posted (to Politics) by xian at 3:08 PM on Wednesday, November 17, 2004
Permanent link to this entry | Comments (4)
Comments

i think all that energy would best be aimed toward reinventing the democratic party... the election is over, there's nothing anyone can do about it, and even if they tried, they would be opposing a popularly elected president - which is treason... in your own words - move on.

Posted by: praetorian at November 17, 2004 5:36 PM

In response to praetorian's comment on 11/17/04 that opposing a popularly elected President is treason: No, it isn't treason to oppose a popularly elected President, unless you live in a fascist state.

Posted by: Michael Z. at November 25, 2004 12:33 PM

TREASON, are you serious? The vote was manipulated... which means that he not only didn't win the election, but he didn't win the majority either stoopid.

Posted by: KBL at December 1, 2004 4:15 PM

Better to address the underlying issue that allows corrupt elections to occur in the first place: Campaign financing.

Without addressing this, all of our future presidents will be bought and paid for before setting foot in the oval office -- regardless of their party.

The corruption begins with lobbyists. And that's where it will have to end.

Posted by: Lynne at December 26, 2004 5:30 PM